Atención: Algunas o todas las identificaciones afectadas por esta división puede haber sido reemplazada por identificaciones de Agaricineae. Esto ocurre cuando no podemos asignar automáticamente una identificación a uno de los taxones de salida. Revisar identificaciones de Agaricaceae 47394

Taxonomic Split 87855 (Guardado el 17/01/2021)

agaric.us has two possible parallel systems here: accepting Agaricaceae broadly, and folding in Lycoperdaceae, or accepting it narrowly and acknowledging three additional families. The latter option seems to preserve information the best at the moment. See: https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/517938#activity_comment_6167591

desconocido
Añadido por jameskm el 17 de enero de 2021 a las 04:04 AM | Resuelto por jameskm en 17 de enero de 2021
dividido en

Comentarios

Why has this split been made? Is there any scientific basis? As far as I am aware the latest literature all direct to keep this all together.

Anotado por pkooij hace 10 meses (Advertencia)

It's all a matter of choice. One family with five well delimited subclades, or five families all closely related. We have been maintaining Lycoperdaceae as separate anyway.

Anotado por jameskm hace 10 meses (Advertencia)

Well, that's the thing; it is not really a matter of choice. As you can see in Varga et al (2019) and Sánchez-García et al (2020), if you apply these splits you are creating polyphyletic groupings. However, maintaining it as Agaricaceae, keeps it as a monophyletic group, which is preferred.

Varga, T., Krizsán, K., Földi, C., Dima, B., Sánchez-García, M., Sánchez-Ramírez, S., et al. (2019). Megaphylogeny resolves global patterns of mushroom evolution. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3(4), 668–678. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0834-1
Sánchez-García, M., Ryberg, M., Khan, F. K., Varga, T., Nagy, L. G., & Hibbett, D. S. (2020). Fruiting body form, not nutritional mode, is the major driver of diversification in mushroom-forming fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 3, 201922539–7. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922539117

Anotado por pkooij hace 10 meses (Advertencia)

In the first reference, the tree is not clear enough to make much out other than that they accept Agaricaceae and Lycoperdaceae. Looking at the second reference, the five families are definitely monophyletic. The only possible issue is Micropsalliota, though it doesn't look like the type species was included. That lineage might be another family, but it isn't clear what would go in it. You can also note that the two papers seem to contradict each other; the first recognizes Lycoperdaceae as a separate family, which the second seems to indicate makes Agaricaceae s. str. polyphyletic (without exclusion of the Micropsalliota clade).

Anotado por jameskm hace 10 meses (Advertencia)

Añade un comentario

Entra o Regístrate para añadir comentarios