incongruities

1) The entry labeled "Elesma subglauca"

https://www.flickr.com/photos/7365168@N02/15469216718/

is a Calathusa ... likely Calathusa octogesima
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=323793

and is repeated erroneously within ALA
https://bie.ala.org.au/species/urn:lsid:biodiversity.org.au:afd.taxon:e141fa49-de46-475c-b44b-8d8e8056f131

as a consequence, my own Calathusa was mis-ID and appears (as of 28 Jan 2017) within the same ALA entry
for E. subglauca.

2) See other journal post
http://www.inaturalist.org/journal/vicfazio3/8231-coff-s-butterfly-house-errors-part-i-s-foveata-c-iostephana-o-ptousalis

concerning Crepidosceles sp.

3) This "Calamotropha leptogrammellus"
https://www.flickr.com/photos/7365168@N02/15362425279/

is indistinguishable from the tropical Calamotropha delatalis
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=121974

though plausible for a very pale C. leptogramellus

Publicado el 19 de enero de 2017 a las 12:15 PM por vicfazio3