Taxonomic Swap 120869 (Guardado el 25/01/2023)

Taxonomy on BugGuide is stated incorrectly. Pérez-Hernández et. al. (2019) did not alter the rank of Neolycus, still a subgenus.

Lycostomus Motschulsky, 1861, is granted full status. However, insofar American species are concerned, historically all workers pointed out that the division is poorly defined. Prefer to keep anything in Lycus, therefore.

Neolycus (type: schoenherri Chevrolat, 1834) contains the more dilated species; Lycus arizonensis Green, 1949, and L. fuliginosus Gorham, 1880 may only figure as "Lycus (Lycus)" in Pérez-Hernández et. al., because they have never been combined previously with Neolycus.

desconocido
Añadido por borisb en 25 de enero de 2023 a las 02:11 PM | Resuelto por borisb en 25 de enero de 2023
reemplazar con

Comentarios

No hay comentarios aún.

Añade un comentario

Entra o Regístrate para añadir comentarios