Taxonomic Merge 127674 (Guardado el 29/06/2023)

Unplaced name in POWO: https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:323514-2

There seems to be no consensus as to the parent species that should constitute a hybrid of this name. As a result, this name is applied to the hybrids of a number of species, and therefore variations on this name cannot be accepted as a taxon here on iNat.

Please mark "No, it's as good as it can be" under "Based on the evidence, can the Community Taxon still be confirmed or improved?" in the DQA to make observations of hybrid taxa at genus level become Research Grade (unless the specific combination of parent species of a specimen has been assigned a name).

Añadido por rynxs en 30 de junio de 2023 a las 05:10 AM | Resuelto por rynxs en 29 de junio de 2023
fue combinado en

Comentarios

The assumed hybrid formula is Callianthe darwinii × Callianthe picta so should that not go to the genus Callianthe rather than Abutilon?

Anotado por davidia hace 10 meses

I didn't realize Callianthe was carved out from Abutilon in POWO/iNat. @loarie would you mind reversing this merge so A. hybridum/A. x hybridum can be put into Callianthe?

Anotado por rynxs hace 10 meses

Añade un comentario

Entra o Regístrate para añadir comentarios