Taxonomic Merge 138057
(Guardado el 18/01/2024)
|
|
fue combinado en |
|
Comentarios
. . . and at least one doublet taxon
(bispinosa present twice - one under genus, one under subgenus Saperdopsis)
Hi Boris! Thanks for pointing that out. I will try to go through and tidy everything up to align with the revision. I'm not sure why Saperdopsis and several of the other old genera are listed as subgenera... Cheers!
Añade un comentario
Entra
o Regístrate
para añadir comentarios
This produced several species names now not in same gender than genus . . .